I'm happy to have contributed some thoughts to Shaun Micallef's new article for the Toronto Star, Toronto's Grudge Against Apartments and the "yellowzone" (Gil Meslin's great term), as shown on this map I made.
There is a commonly held view that new buildings in Toronto are creating a Starbucks and Subway Restaurant-filled commercial monoculture. This study undertook a visual survey of the Downtown Area to compare businesses in new and old mixed use mid-rise and tower buildings. The study showed that independent businesses comprise 64% of commercial units in downtown mixed-use residential/commercial buildings. When compared to older mixed-use residential/commercial buildings in Downtown Toronto, new developments reduce the percentage of independent commercial businesses, by around 10%.Read More
For the past few years, I've had a passing interest in much unloved Brutalist architectural style. Through this, I've noticed that there is very common use of cantilevered upper floors in many buildings of this style. To document these occurrences, I've started a Tumblr about them.
Back in the mid-1990s, Ontario Hydro surplussed one of their transmission corridors in Scarborough. The segment was located between Warden and Pharmacy, and ran from the Finch Hydro Corridor (the one north of, and parallel to, Finch Ave) to the Gatineau Hydro Corridor (the one runs diagonal north of Eglinton Ave). The portion of the corridor located north of Highway 401 was sold to a residential developer, and resulted in a very interesting residential infill project.
When the lands were surplussed, the former City of Scarborough adopted an Official Plan amendment to designate the corridor lands as Open Space. Ontario Hydro and the developer appealed this decision to the OMB. The developer had proposed 666 residential units (around half single detached and half semi-detached), some parks and open space, and a little bit of neighbourhood commercial. Due to the narrow nature of the corridor, in order to accommodate the development, the lots and all building setbacks had to be smaller, and the roads narrower. If you look at an aerial photograph of the area now, it is immediately evident that the corridor development is notably denser than the existing areas that surround it. In 1998, the OMB allowed the appeals and, thus, the infill development.
The OMB decision hinged on the City's inability to quantify how the infill development would lead to "undue adverse impact." Put another way, if there wasn't an impact, there wasn't a reason it should be prohibited. Though I could not find the complete record of the OMB case online, it appears that the City might have attempted to appeal the decision to Divisional Court. The fact that the development exists today suggests that if they did, it clearly wasn't successful.